PEEK vs PI (Polyimide) vs PTFE: Which High-Temp Tube for Your Job?

WELLELE Engineering · 2026-08-20 · 7 min read

PEEK vs PI (Polyimide) vs PTFE: Which High-Temp Tube for Your Job?

Three polymers, three very different failure modes. Get the call wrong and you do not get a cheaper tube, you get a field failure at the worst possible moment.

The question that settles most of the room

Before you reach for a data sheet, ask one thing: does this tube have to carry load, or just contain a fluid? That single question decides this whole comparison.

  • PTFE, a chemical barrier. Cheap, -200 C to +260 C, inert to almost everything. But it cold-flows under load and has no structural stiffness.
  • PI (polyimide), the radiation and temperature king. -269 C to +400 C continuous, survives environments that kill everything else. Expensive, hard to machine.
  • PEEK, the structural workhorse. 260 C continuous with real tensile strength and wear resistance, at a price that still hurts but buys mechanical duty.

The tolerance wall that actually bites

In thin-wall tubing the material comparison is the easy part. The painful part is what the catalogue does not print: concentricity and wall uniformity. A 0.5 mm wall PI tube that is 0.48 mm on one side and 0.53 mm on the other passes a nominal spec but fails a 200 C thermal-cycle test because the thin side ages first. For semiconductor and sensor leads where ID/OD tolerance and a clean, particle-free bore matter, the grade and the die matter more than the polymer name. See the polyimide radiation and semiconductor note.

PropertyPTFEPI (polyimide)PEEK
Continuous temp-200 to +260 C-269 to +400 Cup to +260 C
Radiation resistancePoorExcellentGood
Tensile strength~25 MPa~70 MPa~100 MPa
Thin-wall ID/OD tolerance+/-0.03 to 0.05 mm+/-0.02 to 0.05 mm+/-0.03 to 0.05 mm
Relative cost1x3-5x3-5x
Typical useChemical barrierSensors, aerospace, radiationLoaded, wearing parts

The honest engineering rule

Data density point: in real projects over the last few years, PTFE wins every "just seal it" application, PEEK wins every "it must not flex or wear" application, and PI wins every radiation or extreme-temperature question that nothing else survives. Budget is usually the tie-breaker, not performance. For thin-wall PI, the tie-breaker is whether the supplier can hold the bore, not the price.

"PTFE is a barrier, PEEK is a structure, polyimide is a survivor. You are not choosing polymers, you are choosing failure modes, and then choosing who can hold the tolerance."

Specify the tube for a sensor or semiconductor line and polyimide is the premium answer. For loaded tubing at 260 C, look at PEEK where dimensional stability matters.

Bottom line: tell us the temperature, whether radiation is present, whether the tube carries load, and the ID/OD tolerance you must hold. We will name the grade and send you a drawing-ready spec, no upselling.

Common questions

Which is more expensive, PEEK or PTFE tubing?

PEEK is typically 3-5x the cost of PTFE because of the polymer synthesis and processing window. Price only makes sense where the tube must carry mechanical load or survive radiation - not for a simple chemical barrier.

Can PTFE take radiation?

No. Standard PTFE degrades badly under gamma or electron radiation (chain scission). If radiation is part of the spec, move to polyimide (PI) or PEEK rather than trying to up-rate PTFE.

Is polyimide tubing the same as Kapton?

Kapton is DuPont's trade name for polyimide film/tubing. Generic PI tubing meets the same -269 C to +400 C class when it is true polyimide, but verify the data sheet - some "polyimide" tubes are coated polyester and fail at 150 C.

What wall tolerance do thin-wall PI and PTFE tubes actually hold?

For extruded polyimide and PTFE tubing the practical limit is about +/-0.02 to +/-0.05 mm on wall and ID when you are below 1.0 mm. Below that you are fighting eccentricity from the die, not the material. Our polyimide tubing is quoted against drawing, not against a catalogue range.

Specifying this part?

Send the drawing for a manufacturability review.

Request a quote

← Back to blog